Author Archives: Thomas

2016-05-09 Mercury Transit

Mercury transited the face of the Sun on May 9th.  The entire event was visible from the east coast of the United States, but on the west coast where I am the event had already started at Sunrise and was over by about noon.

I happened to be travelling at the time, so I was unable to photograph the event with my hydrogen alpha setup.  Instead I rented a Canon 100-400mm lens and 2x teleconverter to which I attached a 77mm filter with some Baader solar film.  Unfortunately, I forgot to bring my tripod on the trip (left it right next to the door..yeah!), so I had to rely on the image stabilization and resting the lens on the roof of my car.  I got a couple half decent shots of Mercury with a nice patch of sunspots.

 

2016-05-09 Mercury transit of the Sun with sunspots in white lig 2016-05-09 Mercury transit of the Sun with sunspots in white lig 2016-05-09 Mercury transit of the Sun with sunspots in white lig

The darker spot in the lower right is Mercury.

Summer of Probes

Well I haven’t blogged anything in ages, and I’ve moved to the pacific northwest where I’m not likely to get the same amount of opportunities to use my solar scope as I did in southern California.

New Horizons and Pluto

It’s all good though because this summer we’ve got some great activity in the solar system.  Like most people, when I was a kid, Pluto was a planet.  This exotic place farther from our Sun than any other in the solar system.  Pluto’s been demoted, but it hasn’t diminished in my mind.

Observing Pluto with amateur telescopes is not very exciting.  Pluto is so small and far away that you can’t really tell the difference between Pluto and a star.  I was observing once with a friend who had an 8″ Celestron Ultima 2000 SCT.  These telescopes are computerized, and he wanted to look at Pluto.  So he told the computer, “show me Pluto.”  After the whirring of the motors stopped, we looked in the eyepiece to a what appeared to be a field of stars.  We joked that the only thing we knew was that light reflected from Pluto had entered our eyes.  Had we had detailed star charts we would have been able to figure out which speck of light was Pluto, but Pluto is so dim that I don’t think there’s a chart on the market we could have purchased.  We would have had to make a chart with our computer and print it out.

Anyway, the point of this post is to talk about the NASA New Horizons mission.  The JPL page for the mission is here.  After nearly 10 years flying out to Pluto, New Horizons is starting to get close.  It will pass nearest to Pluto on July 14th before going on to explore the Kuiper Belt.  It’s starting to return photos that are better than anything we’ve taken before, and there only going to get better for the next month.  This is so exiting.  Not only are we going to learn a lot about Pluto, but we will undoubtedly end up with a lot more new questions about Pluto and the formation of our solar system.

My favorite image so far is this animation that shows the odd orbit of Pluto and its largest moon Charon.  Charon’s mass is 11.6% that of Pluto.  We’re used to seeing one object orbit another with much larger mass, so the effect of the smaller object on the larger object is not easily detectable.  However, in this case, it is very obvious that Charon is tugging on Pluto in a very large way.  Both objects orbit around a point in space instead of a point inside Pluto!

Pluto and Charon's odd orbit

Pluto and Charon orbiting a point between both objects.

 

Dawn and Ceres

At the same time NASA’s Dawn mission is in orbit around Ceres the largest object in the asteroid belt.  Some amazing photos of this object have already been returned.  Why not pop over to JPL’s page and have a look.

Rosetta and Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

This one’s been in the news quite a bit lately because earlier this year there was a bit of problem with the Philae lander that was launched from Rosetta.  Philae was supposed to decent from orbit, land and anchor itself on the comet to investigate up close.  However, there was a problem with the landing, and Philae didn’t get anchored.  It’s been without power because its solar cells were shaded until just a few days ago, but its getting enough power to operate again now that the comet is closer to the Sun.

The Planetary Society has a page with very cool 3-D images of the comet.  Here is the European Space Agency media gallery for 67P.

Sunspot AR 2192

On Thursday last week the largest sunspot seen in over 20 years rotated off the face of the Sun.  I managed to snag quite a few images of it, and I thought I’d make a post describing just how interesting this particular spot was.

First let’s look at how the Sun rotates.  I have three images spanning 6 days.  The quality of the images is pretty variable because I don’t really know what I’m doing.

Sol in Hydrogen Alpha (656.28 nm) with AR 2192

The European Space Agency and National Aeronautics and Space Administration have developed a tool called JHelioViewer that let’s individuals create movies from Solar Dynamics Observatory and Solar and Heliospheric Observatory data.  It don’t see any hydrogen-alpha (656.28 nm) data, but the helium II (30.4 nm) data from SDO looks similar enough.  The data is colored red, but 30.4nm light is actually in the far ultra-violet part of the spectrum.  I made a low-res movie that covers the time period that AR 2192 was visible.  All the movies for this post span the period 2014-10-19 0 UT to 2014-10-30 0 UT.

There are quite a few different wavelengths of light to choose from when using JHelioViewer.  It’s interesting to see what the sunspot looks like in different wavelengths.  At 160.0 nm (below) and 170.0 nm (further below), bright flashes around the sunspot look like lightning flashes in a thunderstorm here on Earth.  Both of these wavelengths are also in the ultraviolet, and, thus, they are not visible to the human eye.  If you keep an eye on the sunspot you can see it changing shape over time.  Another thing to notice while you watch the videos is the rotation rate of the sun.  You can see how the rotation at the poles is slower than the rotation at the solar equator.

Finally a great view of just the sunspots can be had at 450.0 nm.  This light would be violet or blue to the eye.  (Don’t ask me why they didn’t color it as it would be seen by the eye.)

These movies really show what a dynamic object the Sun is, and why it makes such a great object for amateurs.  Because of the distance to most objects and the limited resolution available (due to the size of amateur instruments and the atmosphere), the objects we view normally appear static with the exception of the Sun, Jupiter, Saturn, and the inner planets.  Of course, to look at the Sun without damaging your eyes or your equipment, you need a solar filter, but Baader solar film for viewing in white light is quite affordable while glass white light filters are moderately more expensive.

Here is a diagram to illustrate the features of interest in the photos.

Sol in Hydrogen Alpha (656.28 nm) with AR 2192

OK.  Now lets take a look at the scale of what was going on on the Sun because it’s truly mind boggling.

The large sunspot within AR 2192 is 21,000-25,000 km in diameter in this image.  For perspective, the Earth is 12,742 km in diameter.  So that big black dot is roughly twice the diameter of the Earth.

Sol in Hydrogen Alpha (656.28 nm) with AR 2192

The amount of turbulence on the Sun associated with the area around AR 2192 is staggering.  If you look at my photo from 2014-10-12 in an earlier post, then you can see a more normal surface texture of the sun.  In the photos with AR 2192, the surface in a region about 750,000 km in diameter is completely disturbed.  The huge plage running through AR 2192 is about 225,000 km long.

Earlier this year we had another big spot that survived over a half rotation, so there’s a chance that this spot will reappear when it rotates back into our view near the end of November.  It should be interesting.

Here are the two best images without any annotations.

Sol in Hydrogen Alpha (656.28 nm) with AR 2192Sol in Hydrogen Alpha (656.28 nm) with AR 2192

The Sun in Hydrogen Alpha light

I’ve managed to piece together a pretty nice setup for observing the Sun in hyrogen alpha light.  It doesn’t work quite as well for photography, but I managed to grab the image below today.  The H-alpha filter is a 75mm Lunt Solar Systems double stack with a 0.05 nm bandpass.  This narrow bandpass really brings out the granulation on the surface compared to the wider single stack bandpass that shows primarily prominices.  Next time out, I’ll grab a pair of photos to illustrate the difference between the single stack (0.07nm) bandpass and the double stack bandpass.   The filter was attached to a TeleVue NP101is.

Sol in Hydrogen Alpha

How big are sunspots?

I was showing a friend the sun today, and he asked how big the sunspots were. I told him I’d send him a photo of the Venus transit across the face of the Sun last year, so he could get a feel for the sunspots relative to the size of the Earth. I told him he’d have to take into account, the fact that Venus is a considerable distance from the Sun, and, thus, it appears larger than it would if it were at the surface of the Sun like the sunspots. I thought I’d do some calculations to give some absolute numbers on the diameter of the spots based on how big Venus appears in the photos. Here they are for all to see.

Some quick facts:

  • The Earth’s mean distance from the Sun is about 150,000,000 km.
  • Venus’ mean distance from the Sun is 108,000,000 km.
  • The Sun’s approximate radius is 700,000 km.
  • The Earth’s mean radius is 6371 km.
  • Venus’ mean radius is 6052 km.

OK. I’m going to ignore:

  • Uncertainties
  • The orbits of the Earth and Venus are not perfectly circular, and they precess around the Sun. (In other words, the orbits are ovals and the long axis of the oval itself rotates around the sun.) This means the distance between the Earth and Venus varies by almost 7,000,000 km.

I’m going to calculate the size of the sunspot two different ways to check the work. Let’s go with the simplest method first.

First method: Relative size of the sunspot and the Sun in the image.

Using the relative size of the sunspot and the sun in the photo, we can just calculate the ratio in pixels and apply it to the known size of the Sun in km to determine the sunspot size in km.

The image I’m publishing is scaled down and compressed using a lossy compression which is going to fuzz things a bit, so any measurement you would do will vary from the uncompressed master image I used for measurements. In the master image, the round sunspot to the below left of center appears to be between 25-26 pixels in diameter when measuring the penumbra (the gray outer region of the spot) , and the Sun itself appears to be between 1180 and 1186 pixels in diameter.

The ratio of the average size in pixels is then: ((25+26)/2) / ((1180+1186)/2) = 0.02156

Applied to a diameter of 1,400,000 km for the Sun produces a size of: 0.02156 * 1,400,000km = 30184 km.

Second method: Use trigonometry and the known sizes and distances of objects.

Given the above facts, approximate distance of an observer on Earth from the surface of the Sun is:

150,000,000 – 700,000 – 6371 km = 149,293,629 km

The radius of the Earth is really insignificant here because the variability of the distance between the Earth and the Sun (approx. 5,000,000 km) is far larger (which itself is not too significant because the variability is much less than the average distance), but I threw it in to show it has been considered.

In the master image, Venus at a distance of 150,000,000 – 108,000,000 – 6371 km (41,993,629) from the observer appears to be between 36 and 37 pixels in diameter.

  • From the Earth, Venus appears as 2 * atan(6052 / 41,993,629) = 0.01651 degrees.
  • At the Sun, Venus would appear 2 * atan(6052 / 149,293,629) = 0.004645 degrees
  • The ratio between those two angles is 0.004645 / 0.01651 = 0.2813.
  • If we apply this ratio to the pixel size of Venus, we can determine how many pixels it would be if it were at the distance of the Sun’s surface. This results in an average size of 10.25 pixels.
  • Previously, we measured the sunspot to be 25-26 pixels, so the sunspot must be (25.5 / 10.25) * (6052 * 2) km = 30,112 km.

So, both methods produce a value of about 30,000 km (about 2.5x the size of Venus or the Earth). The difference could be attributed to:

  1. The real distance between Earth and Venus on the day the photo was taken may have been quite different from the rough estimate that was used. A rough estimate for the Earth-Sun distance was also used, but the same value was used in both calculations, so that shouldn’t cause an issue.
  2. The pixel measurements are a little fuzzy. When you examine the image closely you see that the edges of both the Sun and Venus are a little fuzzy. Some of this is certainly a result of the BayerFilter on the CMOS sensor in my digital SLR, and some of it might also be the atmospheric distortion above the surfaces of the object.
  3. The way the calculations were done assume that the Sun as measured is the same distance from the observer as the sunspot, but in fact the diameter of the sun being measured is an additional 700,000 km farther making it appear smaller.
2012-06-05 Venus Transit With Sunspots (22:28 UTC)

Venus transiting the sun on 2012-06-05 22:28 UTC. The image also has sunspots which allows us to determine how big the sunspots are compared to the known size of Venus.

Solar Binoculars

I thought I’d make a post to show people the binoculars I use for observing sunspots.  I have a pair of Canon 18×50 IS binoculars that I use almost exclusively for astronomical observing.  These binoculars have 58mm filter threads which made it easy to take 4 58mm UV filters and some Baader Planetarium Solar Safety Film to make a little white light solar filter for each lens.  I removed the retaining ring from two of the UV filters to extract the glass and cut Baader film for each.  I then reassembled the UV filters.  This leaves the film exposed to getting ripped or cut by physical contact, so I just screwed one of the unmodified UV filters to each of the modified filters to protect the film.  The 58mm solar filters can be removed for night observing just by unscrewing them from the binos.

It would be lovely to have more than 18x magnification or to have a hydrogen alpha filter for viewing more details, but these binoculars are so easy to carry around and use, I find myself using them a lot.  The 18x magnification is enough to that penumbra and umbra can be discerned on medium size or larger sunspots.

The Baader film works great.  I’ve made filters for 4″ and 5″ telescopes out of it over the years.  Last year I used one of those filters to take photos of the Venus transit of the Sun and a partial solar eclipse.  They turned out pretty good.  I’ll dig them up and post them soon.

Below is a photo of my binos with one of the solar filters removed.

_DSF0423

Amateur-Astronomy.net

I’m setting up a amateur astronomy community site at http://www.amateur-astronomy.net.  I often get asked for advice by people interested in the hobby or who are just getting started.  I’ve been recycling an email to answer beginner issues for a while now.  Having a forum will allow an open discussion that all future questioners can benefit from as well.

CloudyNights and Astromart both provide this type of environment, but I have some ideas for improving the experience.  Hopefully, I’ll have time to finish the required software.

OCA Meeting and Infrared Astronomy

I went to the meeting of the Orange County Astronomers at Chapman University last night.  The guest speaker was Dr. Luisa Rebull from Caltech.  She gave a great talk about the insights we’ve gathered from infrared astronomy over the last 30 years.  The focus was on four space telescopes, IRAS, WISE, Spitzer, and Herschel.  A very enthusiastic speaker with great material.  I think even my wife enjoyed the talk.

The atmosphere makes ground based infrared astronomy impractical.  Several years ago I saw a blog about a homebrew project where some people launched a weather balloon with a camera attached.  They managed to get pretty high up.  I thought it would be cool to recreate the project but use a digital camera with the IR filter removed.  Maybe someday when I’ve got nothing but time.

Here’s a link with her giving the same lecture to a different group.

Solar Activity

I took another look at the Sun today.  The high solar activity continues.  The sun looked like someone had strafed it.  There was a line of sunspots in a line near the solar equator across nearly the entire face of the sun.  Maybe its time to buy that hydrogen alpha filter.

First post.

I just got the blog software running on my host.  The plan is to put something up when I go out with the scope or see an interesting news item.

I’ll just make a note about the two interesting experiences I’ve had recently.
Last week I noticed on Phil Plait’s blog that the massive sunspot AR1944 had managed to last a full solar rotation and was back in view.  I had managed to catch just the very end of its last appearance, and I wanted to get a good view of it.  So, I grabbed the Canon 18x50IS binoculars with Baader Solar Film that I use for quick solar viewing and headed out for a look.  I have never seen such a large sunspot complex.  AR1944 (now AR1967) has a couple very large spots and a bunch of smaller hangers on.  Very impressive.

So the other thing is that a couple weeks ago I took my 20″ Starmaster out to have a look at the supernova in M82.  I was really surprised by how bright the supernova was.   If you’re familiar with how M82 looks in your scope, it would have been obvious.  I managed to take some photos with my Fujifilm EX-1 camera through the 20, but the lack of equatorial tracking made the supernova and nearby stars really blobby.  It wasn’t bad for a first attempt though.  I also tried to grab some images of M42 and Jupiter, but I definitely need some practice before I produce anything good.

M82 & SN2014J

M82 & SN2014J